Latest news
Netflix-Gebäude in Los Gatos, aufgenommen im Juli 2008
Netflix in Los Gatos, Archivaufnahme 2008. Coolcaesar, englischsprachige Wikipedia / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0; unveränderte Datei.
Economy22:30 UhrJournalPlus RedaktionReading time: 4 min0 comments

Netflix: Lower usage puts price promise to the test

Reports of declining usage meet rising revenue. For Swiss households an announced advertising tier is also becoming relevant – but US measurements do not explain their own viewing behaviour.

Netflix is earning more money even as doubts grow about how tightly it holds its audience. On 25 October 2026, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the figures, that customers opened the app on fewer days and watched less on average than before. According to the report, the company did not comment on the internal metrics.

At the same time, the publicly available business figures show growth: in the third quarter Netflix generated revenue of 12.874 billion dollars, 11.8 percent more than a year earlier. The apparent contradiction dissolves when revenue, usage and customer numbers are looked at separately. For Swiss subscribers, what matters is not the stock market valuation but the service they receive for their monthly bill.

Three metrics, three different statements

Bloomberg describes, among other things, «qualified play days», an internal metric for how often the service is used. Such figures are an indication of customer loyalty, but they are not a publicly accessible full survey whose definitions and time series could be independently recalculated. The report also says that total viewing time rose slightly in the first half of the year because more customers joined.

More total hours with fewer hours per membership is arithmetically possible. Revenue can likewise rise if higher prices or additional paying accounts offset weaker usage. That does not automatically mean a wave of cancellations, nor does it prove that the offering is gaining value for every household.

Changes in account sharing in particular make comparisons difficult. If the same viewing time is in future attributed to several paid memberships, average usage per account falls without all previous viewers having to watch less television. Whether this effect explains the reported decline cannot be conclusively determined from the publicly cited internal data.

What independent US figures contribute

On 22 October, Nielsen reported a Netflix share of 7.7 percent of total US television time for the measurement month of August. YouTube reached 15.8 percent. That shows the competition for attention, but it measures something different from monthly app openings: television usage in the US rather than personal usage across all devices and countries.

The period also matters. The August measurement runs from 27 July to 30 August. Nielsen also announces a methodological adjustment from September; September and October are to be published together later. A report published in October is therefore not an October measurement. From these figures a decline in Swiss usage can certainly not be quantified.

Remote control of a streaming device with dedicated buttons for several providers
Several streaming services compete for the same space on the remote control. Symbolic photo, 2018. Flickr Stock Catalog / Quote Catalog, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0; unmodified file.

Advertising is meant to open a second revenue path

Netflix itself describes the reaction to its 2026 price increases as expected and customer retention as healthy. That is the company's assessment. At the same time, it lowered its expectation for annual advertising revenue from around three to 2.7 billion dollars, citing the slower rollout of certain advertising features.

The advertising business makes usage additionally relevant in economic terms: not only the monthly fee but also monetisable attention then contributes to revenue. Less viewing time can limit this second path. How strongly depends on advertising prices and utilisation, among other things; a linear conversion of viewing minutes into revenue would be unsound.

What Swiss households can actually check

In its Swiss help pages, Netflix currently lists 14.90 francs a month for Basic, 22.90 for Standard and 29.90 for Premium. Differences concern, among other things, picture quality and the number of devices that can be used at the same time. Bundle offers may differ. A higher tier is therefore worthwhile not simply because of a bigger name, but if its functions are actually needed in the household.

A simple calculation makes the difference visible: anyone using the Standard subscription ten hours a month pays, arithmetically, 2.29 francs per hour; at fifty hours it is around 46 centimes. This is a worked example, not a statement about average Swiss usage.

Netflix has announced that it will extend its advertising subscription to nine additional European countries, including Switzerland, on 1 March 2027. That announcement does not name a Swiss price. The announcement is therefore not yet a savings offer available today and not a documented offset for earlier price increases.

Anyone who watches rarely can check their actual needs independently of corporate metrics. Netflix allows cancellation at any time; usage generally continues until the end of the paid period. Where billing is handled by a partner, that partner's cancellation channels apply. Merely deleting the app does not end the subscription. For Swiss households, this distinction is more financially tangible than any global engagement metric.

Sources

Share article

Report an error in this article

Thanks for the tip. Please describe the error as precisely as possible.

PNG, JPG or WebP, max. 5 MB

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.