Latest news
Rohöltanker Eagle San Diego auf See, Archivaufnahme vom Dezember 2024
Rohöltanker Eagle San Diego bei Port Angeles, 30. Dezember 2024. Symbolaufnahme des Öltransports; kein belegter Zusammenhang dieses Schiffs mit den gemeldeten Gesprächen. Foto: Jordanroderick / Wikimedia Commons, CC0 1.0, unverändert.
Economy14:00 UhrJournalPlus RedaktionReading time: 4 min0 comments

Russian oil deals: a US waiver would not be a Swiss free pass

The FT reports on possible deals for US oil companies in the Ukraine peace process. For Geneva's commodities trade, destination, counterparties and Swiss bans remain decisive.

The Financial Times reported on 27 October 2026 on talks about Russian business for American oil companies as part of the Ukraine negotiations. Such a prospect also affects Swiss commodities trading. It does not yet mean, however, that a company in Geneva could buy, finance or ship Russian oil as a matter of course. What continues to count are the rules actually in force and the specific transaction.

The publicly visible FT headline describes talks, not a completed general opening of the market. Details about the companies involved or contractual terms cannot be reliably determined from it. For the Swiss assessment, a different, verifiable question is therefore more useful: which decisions would have to lie between a political announcement and a permissible delivery?

Washington does not decide on Swiss bans

In the US, the sanctions authority OFAC can authorise certain otherwise prohibited transactions through general or individual licences. Such licences come with conditions and a defined scope. A permission for a specific transaction is not the same as lifting all sanctions against a country or a trading partner.

Switzerland, for its part, decides on its own measures. SECO explicitly states that even EU sanctions are not automatically adopted. Sanctions imposed by third states have in principle no direct effect here. The reverse limit follows from this as well: an American exemption does not replace a Swiss exemption and does not lift a Swiss ban.

That does not mean that foreign rules are unimportant for internationally active companies. It means first of all that different legal systems must be examined separately. An authorisation in one system does not answer all questions in the others. SECO, for its part, does not provide binding information on the legal systems of foreign states.

Destination and service change the assessment

The Swiss Ukraine ordinance distinguishes between several operations. Article 12a prohibits, under the conditions stated there, the purchase with destination Switzerland as well as the import, transit and transport of Russian crude oil and certain petroleum products into and through Switzerland. It also covers related services and funds. The article contains expressly regulated exceptions.

Article 12b, by contrast, concerns trade, brokering and transport with or to states outside Switzerland and the European Economic Area. Financial services may also be covered. Here the ordinance provides, among other things, for an exception if the purchase price does not exceed the relevant price cap. That is a different constellation from a delivery to Switzerland.

The price cap is therefore not a universal stamp of approval. In addition, bans may apply to specific companies, banks or ships. Article 12d, for example, contains separate restrictions for listed ships. A favourable purchase price alone does not answer these questions. Nor is it enough to know who sells the oil on paper.

For certain service providers, Article 12b also requires itemised information on ancillary costs. Documenting the supply chain is therefore not merely a voluntary precaution. It can itself be part of the prescribed assessment and must be made available to the counterparties or to SECO on request.

Panorama of Geneva seen from Mont Salève
Geneva is one of Switzerland's commodities trading centres. Archive panorama from 2008, not an image of ongoing negotiations. © Yann Forget / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA 4.0, unmodified.

Why a deal concerns Geneva without arriving here

According to Presence Switzerland, many raw materials are bought and resold by Swiss companies without physically reaching Switzerland. Geneva, Zug and Lugano are among the important trading centres. A contract concluded in Geneva therefore need not coincide with Swiss import statistics. That is precisely what makes the distinction between destination, brokering and financing relevant.

The ordinance also covers certain petroleum products that were produced in third countries from Russian crude oil. Article 12abis regulates bans, certificates of origin and exceptions for these. A different port of loading or refining in another country is therefore not sufficient as blanket proof that the origin had become legally irrelevant.

For the economic assessment, questions remain open: what volumes would actually be offered? Which partners would be admitted? What transport and financing costs would arise? Without this information, neither an additional Swiss trading gain nor a concrete relief at the petrol pump can be calculated from diplomatic talks.

According to SECO, responsibility for complying with Swiss sanctions lies with the companies concerned. For Geneva's trading hub, the decisive free pass would therefore not be the next political pledge but a verifiable legal basis for each affected part of the transaction. Only then can it be assessed whether a conversation idea actually turns into tradeable oil.

Sources

Share article

Report an error in this article

Thanks for the tip. Please describe the error as precisely as possible.

PNG, JPG or WebP, max. 5 MB

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.